<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Performance Based Testing Review Pilot Exam 70-113</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113</link>
	<description>Technical &#38; SEO Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THOR</title>
		<link>http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113/comment-page-1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>THOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelawlor.com/?p=102#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Done 83-640 twice now, it crashed the first time (and failed me), second time I went VERY slowly and did not create any custom consoles (MMCs), failed again. Funny though, I remember every task and multiple-choice question, and cam ehome and verified everything (in a real environment), should&#039;ve aced it. Note that I have been MCSE certified since 96, always done the exams (full courses - no upgrades) without &#039;Transcenders&#039; mand such, and have been working with this stuff for 15 years. Found the test easy, and can&#039;t figure out how I failed it.

Anyone have any advice or a similar experience? I&#039;m stumped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done 83-640 twice now, it crashed the first time (and failed me), second time I went VERY slowly and did not create any custom consoles (MMCs), failed again. Funny though, I remember every task and multiple-choice question, and cam ehome and verified everything (in a real environment), should&#8217;ve aced it. Note that I have been MCSE certified since 96, always done the exams (full courses &#8211; no upgrades) without &#8216;Transcenders&#8217; mand such, and have been working with this stuff for 15 years. Found the test easy, and can&#8217;t figure out how I failed it.</p>
<p>Anyone have any advice or a similar experience? I&#8217;m stumped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Beta Exam 71-680 &#124; Dave Lawlor {Dot} Com</title>
		<link>http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113/comment-page-1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Beta Exam 71-680 &#124; Dave Lawlor {Dot} Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelawlor.com/?p=102#comment-90</guid>
		<description>[...] test.&#160; I was hoping this exam would bring a launch of “performance” based testing like the 70-113 pilot exam.&#160; This one had the age old exhibit pictures to work with and standard text questions, though [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] test.&#160; I was hoping this exam would bring a launch of “performance” based testing like the 70-113 pilot exam.&#160; This one had the age old exhibit pictures to work with and standard text questions, though [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david whitmore</title>
		<link>http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113/comment-page-1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>david whitmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelawlor.com/?p=102#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I am writing the 083-740 on Jan 15, 2009 as they don&#039;t offer 70-640 anymore. What can you tell me about the new exam. I have studied the 70-740 &amp; transcender questions. I fell confident about the 70-640  but not sure about the new exam. Thanks for you help. Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am writing the 083-740 on Jan 15, 2009 as they don&#8217;t offer 70-640 anymore. What can you tell me about the new exam. I have studied the 70-740 &amp; transcender questions. I fell confident about the 70-640  but not sure about the new exam. Thanks for you help. Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelawlor.com/?p=102#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I wrote the 083-640 exam today. I love this new &quot;performance-based&quot; exam format. I think it is a much better test of your skills as an administrator than just multiple choice questions.
I hope they will develop more of these exams in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote the 083-640 exam today. I love this new &#8220;performance-based&#8221; exam format. I think it is a much better test of your skills as an administrator than just multiple choice questions.<br />
I hope they will develop more of these exams in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.davelawlor.com/ms-performance-based-testing-review-pilot-70-113/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davelawlor.com/?p=102#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree. Well, there were items in the labs that I find weird being there because to me they were just totally wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree. Well, there were items in the labs that I find weird being there because to me they were just totally wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
